The purpose of this article is to discuss the top 7 EDR solutions for 2024.
This article aims to offer an overview of the leading 7 Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions available in the market. The surge in demand for EDR solutions stems from their advanced functionalities that surpass those of traditional antivirus and endpoint protection software. According to research from Allied Market Research, the EDR sector exhibits a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 25%. In contrast, antivirus solutions show a negative CAGR of -0.83%, as outlined in a MarketWatch report from July 2022.

Not all EDR solutions are created equal, and finding the most suitable one for your specific requirements is crucial. The compilation of the top 10 EDR solutions listed here is not in any particular order. Each solution brings unique value to cater to distinct customer profiles. When assessing EDR options, it is essential to discern which solution aligns best with your organization’s needs. Consulting with an EDR specialist can aid in evaluating your objectives and environment, leading to the identification of the most suitable solution for your organization.
Top 7 EDR Solutions for 2024
The top 7 EDR solutions for 2024 listed in this article are in by no means ordered in any specific order. Each EDR solution has its own unique value they bring to the table and must be evaluated by the organization’s needs. Not by peer review, and certainly not by a blog’s recommendation.
1. SentinelOne
SentinelOne, established in 2013 and headquartered in Mountainview, California, offers an EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) platform known for its core strengths lying within its security operations center and the platform’s functionality. Clients have the option to either entrust SentinelOne to manage the EDR platform or handle it internally within their security team. The platform aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK framework and recently spearheaded the MITRE Engenuity ATT&CK® Evaluations. Functioning on an agent-based system, it extends support to AWS, Azure, Google Cloud (GCP), containers, Kubernetes, and 12 Linux distributions. Moreover, it is compatible with Windows Server 2022 and backward to Windows Server 2003 SP2.
The offerings are presented in three distinct packages: Core, Control, and Complete. Additionally, clients can opt for add-ons such as Ranger, designed to detect potential compromises within Active Directory and network devices like enterprise switches and firewalls.
However, SentinelOne has limitations concerning DLP (Data Loss Prevention), but it offers an alternative—a honey pot option called Singularity Hologram. Acting as a simulated high-value target within the network, this feature attracts threat actors. When a threat actor engages with the honey pot, they are exposed.
Pros:
- Mature EDR solution with supplementary options complementing core EDR functions.
- 24×7 Managed Detection and Response from SentinelOne’s Security Operations Center.
- Extensive support for various operating systems and cloud environments.
- Recognized favorably by leading industry analysts.
- Positive customer feedback for deployment services and customer support.
- Competitive pricing.
- Minimal system resource usage.
- Scalable for up to 10,000 endpoints.
Cons:
- Requires configuration and familiarization with the environment.
- Known to impact performance on specific workloads, necessitating exclusions.
- Extended logging may need to be requested or included in pricing.
- Requires a higher-tier subscription for detailed attack process tree/timeline.
- Can be resource-intensive on the CPU.
2. Cybereason
Cybereason, established in 2012 and based in Boston, Massachusetts, specializes in endpoint protection and endpoint detection and response. The company aims to expedite the detection, triage, and remediation of potential threats. Central to the Cybereason solution is its SOC (Security Operations Center) and Defense platform, functioning as an EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) tool. The distinguishing features of Cybereason’s offering are the MalOps Severity Score and Extended Response. The MalOps Severity Score, evaluated based on behavioral analysis, expert assessment, and endpoint significance within an organization, guides incident response decisions. Cybereason aims to identify incidents within a minute, triage them in under 5 minutes, and remediate them within 30 minutes. Additionally, Cybereason asserts its ability to safeguard workloads across various cloud environments.
Pros:
- Unique MalOps Severity Score proposition
- 24×7 Managed Detection and Response services from the Cybereason SOC
- Wide-ranging support for multiple operating systems and cloud platforms
- Competitive pricing
- Low system resource usage
Cons:
- Limited visibility and centralization of the dashboard
- Reported compatibility issues involving PowerShell
- Lack of sandbox functionality
- Recently began supporting Linux (December 2021)
- Limited integrations with other security tools
3. Carbon Black
Carbon Black has its origins dating back to 2002 through the establishment of Bit9. The Boston-based Bit9 acquired Carbon Black, based in Texas, in 2014, eventually rebranding the combined entity solely as Carbon Black. In 2019, Carbon Black was subsequently acquired by VMware.
A notable value proposition from Carbon Black stems from its purported excellence in VMware integration, a result of its acquisition by VMware. Users who have provided feedback about Carbon Black appreciate the comprehensive visibility it offers into endpoint activities via its dashboard. Notably, users can readily identify infections or malicious actions and trigger automatic quarantines for individual systems or a group of systems directly from the dashboard. Similar to SentinelOne, Carbon Black also provides the option for its security operations center to manage the EDR tool, although users can choose to self-manage or opt for third-party management.
However, Carbon Black encounters limitations due to its dependency on cloud connectivity, posing constraints in environments without internet access. Additionally, it faces limitations concerning firewall control and operating system support.
Pros:
- Lightweight
- Highly customizable
- 24×7 Managed Detection and Response from Carbon Black’s security operations center
- A mature product that necessitates substantial time for tuning and proper deployment
- Minimal performance issues if deployed and fine-tuned correctly
Cons:
- Higher cost
- Previous issues reported with certain workloads
- Requires management from a proficient security operations center
- Professional deployment services are recommended
- Can be CPU intensive
4. CrowdStrike
CrowdStrike Falcon stands out as an exemplary EDR solution, encompassing an extensive array of features and functionalities essential for EDR requirements, with the capability to adapt and accommodate the needs of large-scale enterprise organizations—something not commonly found in other EDR solutions. In addition to tailoring customized policies for addressing attacks, the console provides actionable insights into remediation tasks, offering solutions for vulnerabilities within the environment and enabling direct system patching via the console.
Offering a SaaS-based solution, CrowdStrike delivers a lightweight agent designed to safeguard workloads spanning physical, virtual, and cloud servers. It extends protection to a wide range of operating systems including Windows, Mac, Linux, Android, iOS, and containers. The agent is equipped with capabilities for threat hunting, vulnerability management, zero-day assessment, and conducting IT hygiene checks.
CrowdStrike Falcon’s remote access tool allows for the direct remediation of nearly all types of malicious activities from the console, effortlessly restoring disabled protective services back to their normal state.
Pros:
- Extensive and mature feature set
- Scalability to accommodate 100K+ endpoints
- Cloud-based dashboard
- 24×7 Managed Detection and Response provided by CrowdStrike’s security operations center
- Robust and mature integrations with AWS, Azure, Linux, Windows, and virtual environments
- User-friendly and intuitive interface compared to other solutions
- Granular drill-down into indications of compromise
- Cloud discovery capability to identify all organizational workloads in the cloud
Cons:
- Higher cost compared to other solutions
5. Cylance
BlackBerry acquired Cylance in 2019, and the entity now operates as BlackBerry Cybersecurity, based in Irvine, California. Established with a proactive approach, Cylance, now known as BlackBerry Cybersecurity, has garnered mixed reviews among users. While some have reported its effectiveness, emphasizing its heuristic-based antivirus capabilities, others have highlighted the need for extensive tuning. According to discussions on platforms like Reddit, there’s a comparison between Cylance and SentinelOne, suggesting varied experiences among users. G2 research indicates its prevalence among mid-market companies as opposed to large enterprises.
Pros:
- Cloud-enabled, capable of operating on-premise or in the cloud without internet dependency
- Offers device and application control functionalities
Cons:
- Reviews suggest higher costs compared to other solutions, with pricing discrepancies
- Requires considerable tuning similar to other solutions but may lack some advanced features
- Positioned more as a mid-market solution rather than an enterprise-focused one
6. FortiEDR
Fortinet’s acquisition of enSilo in 2019 propelled the company toward its objective of establishing a comprehensive cybersecurity fabric extending from network infrastructure to endpoint security. This acquisition incorporated enSilo’s technology, now known as FortiEDR, renowned for its patented code-tracing technology designed to prevent data exfiltration and malware propagation. Operating as a traditional EDR service, FortiEDR offers forensic analysis and incident response capabilities. It is adaptable for deployment either on-premise or in cloud environments, operating independently from other Fortinet products, although there is notable integration between FortiEDR and the wider product line. For instance, FortiEDR seamlessly interacts with FortiGate firewalls, Sandboxing, and FortiNAC for automated rule creation through its Playbook feature. Moreover, it allows the inclusion of third-party connectors for integration with other vendor solutions, as detailed in the FortiEDR Integration Guide.
Pros:
- Strategic integration capability with other Fortinet products to establish a comprehensive security framework
- Incorporates Data Loss Prevention (DLP) features
- Flexible deployment options: on-premise or cloud-based
- User-friendly interface with straightforward setup and implementation
Cons:
- Lacks native 24×7 managed EDR service; may require third-party solutions
- FortiEDR 2022 MITRE ATT&CK Engenuity Visibility Count: 87 of 90 sub-steps
For personalized assistance and guidance in selecting an EDR solution that aligns with your objectives and environment, feel free to connect with a dedicated EDR specialist by filling out the form below (available for U.S.-based inquiries only).
7. BitDefender
Bitdefender operates as a cloud-based SaaS EDR solution utilizing an agent-based approach to continuously capture events. Their platform, the Bitdefender Control Center, empowers administrators to visualize, investigate, and promptly respond to potential security compromises by employing actions such as deletion, isolation, blacklisting, or termination. The company has significantly expanded its market reach by focusing on Managed Service Providers (MSPs) through its MSP cloud console, allowing MSPs to efficiently manage multiple clients simultaneously. While Bitdefender has established a strong foothold in small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and the mid-market segment, it appears to have a limited presence in larger enterprises (with over 10,000 endpoints). Bitdefender’s EDR customer case studies showcasing their success stories can be found here.
Pros:
- 24×7 Managed Detection and Response available through Bitdefender’s security operations center
- Particularly appealing for MSPs, small businesses, and environments with under 10,000 endpoints
- Offers a compact footprint
Cons:
- Solely reliant on cloud infrastructure
- Reports suggest areas of improvement needed in the control panel functionality
- Requires collaboration with experienced partners for setup, support, and licensing inquiries; Bitdefender primarily relies on channel partners (VARs, Resellers, and MSPs) for customer fulfillment, deployment, and support services.